To contact us Click HERE
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
30 Kasım 2012 Cuma
You Forgot, Mr. President, "We Don't Leave Americans Behind"
To contact us Click HERE
The following videos all broke on Oct. 26th. They indicate that the White House observed the Benghazi assault visually and in real time over almost 6 1/2 hours and early on in the assault from the highest levels (POTUS) turned down repeated requests for assistance from both the Ambassador and intelligence officers on the ground in Benghazi. Events completely contrary to what the American people had been told prior to Oct. 26th. Our assessment of the situation follows below these videos:
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
TESTED: Osama for Obama's Foreign Contributions
To contact us Click HERE
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Navy SEALs Don't Trust Obama
To contact us Click HERE
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...

The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...
The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
Obama's BenghaziGate: October Surprise Gone Bad
To contact us Click HERE
The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

29 Kasım 2012 Perşembe
Obama's Failed Foreign Policy: Al-Qaeda Resurgent
To contact us Click HERE
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
You Forgot, Mr. President, "We Don't Leave Americans Behind"
To contact us Click HERE
The following videos all broke on Oct. 26th. They indicate that the White House observed the Benghazi assault visually and in real time over almost 6 1/2 hours and early on in the assault from the highest levels (POTUS) turned down repeated requests for assistance from both the Ambassador and intelligence officers on the ground in Benghazi. Events completely contrary to what the American people had been told prior to Oct. 26th. Our assessment of the situation follows below these videos:
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
TESTED: Osama for Obama's Foreign Contributions
To contact us Click HERE
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Navy SEALs Don't Trust Obama
To contact us Click HERE
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...

The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...
The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
Obama's BenghaziGate: October Surprise Gone Bad
To contact us Click HERE
The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

28 Kasım 2012 Çarşamba
Obama's Failed Foreign Policy: Al-Qaeda Resurgent
To contact us Click HERE
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
You Forgot, Mr. President, "We Don't Leave Americans Behind"
To contact us Click HERE
The following videos all broke on Oct. 26th. They indicate that the White House observed the Benghazi assault visually and in real time over almost 6 1/2 hours and early on in the assault from the highest levels (POTUS) turned down repeated requests for assistance from both the Ambassador and intelligence officers on the ground in Benghazi. Events completely contrary to what the American people had been told prior to Oct. 26th. Our assessment of the situation follows below these videos:
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
TESTED: Osama for Obama's Foreign Contributions
To contact us Click HERE
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Navy SEALs Don't Trust Obama
To contact us Click HERE
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...

The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...
The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
Obama's BenghaziGate: October Surprise Gone Bad
To contact us Click HERE
The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

27 Kasım 2012 Salı
Obama's Failed Foreign Policy: Al-Qaeda Resurgent
To contact us Click HERE
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
You Forgot, Mr. President, "We Don't Leave Americans Behind"
To contact us Click HERE
The following videos all broke on Oct. 26th. They indicate that the White House observed the Benghazi assault visually and in real time over almost 6 1/2 hours and early on in the assault from the highest levels (POTUS) turned down repeated requests for assistance from both the Ambassador and intelligence officers on the ground in Benghazi. Events completely contrary to what the American people had been told prior to Oct. 26th. Our assessment of the situation follows below these videos:
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
TESTED: Osama for Obama's Foreign Contributions
To contact us Click HERE
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Navy SEALs Don't Trust Obama
To contact us Click HERE
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...

The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...
The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
Obama's BenghaziGate: October Surprise Gone Bad
To contact us Click HERE
The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

26 Kasım 2012 Pazartesi
Obama's Failed Foreign Policy: Al-Qaeda Resurgent
To contact us Click HERE
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
You Forgot, Mr. President, "We Don't Leave Americans Behind"
To contact us Click HERE
The following videos all broke on Oct. 26th. They indicate that the White House observed the Benghazi assault visually and in real time over almost 6 1/2 hours and early on in the assault from the highest levels (POTUS) turned down repeated requests for assistance from both the Ambassador and intelligence officers on the ground in Benghazi. Events completely contrary to what the American people had been told prior to Oct. 26th. Our assessment of the situation follows below these videos:
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
TESTED: Osama for Obama's Foreign Contributions
To contact us Click HERE
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Navy SEALs Don't Trust Obama
To contact us Click HERE
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...

The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...
The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
Obama's BenghaziGate: October Surprise Gone Bad
To contact us Click HERE
The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

25 Kasım 2012 Pazar
Obama's Failed Foreign Policy: Al-Qaeda Resurgent
To contact us Click HERE
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
You Forgot, Mr. President, "We Don't Leave Americans Behind"
To contact us Click HERE
The following videos all broke on Oct. 26th. They indicate that the White House observed the Benghazi assault visually and in real time over almost 6 1/2 hours and early on in the assault from the highest levels (POTUS) turned down repeated requests for assistance from both the Ambassador and intelligence officers on the ground in Benghazi. Events completely contrary to what the American people had been told prior to Oct. 26th. Our assessment of the situation follows below these videos:
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
TESTED: Osama for Obama's Foreign Contributions
To contact us Click HERE
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Navy SEALs Don't Trust Obama
To contact us Click HERE
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...

The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
U.S. Const. Art. II Sec. 3 Clause 5: Caring for the faithful execution of the law:
The President must "take care that the laws be faithfully executed." This clause in the U.S. Constitution imposes a duty on the President to take due care while executing laws and is called Take Care Clause, also known as the Faithful Execution Clause. The purpose of this clause is to ensure that a law is faithfully executed by the President, even if the president disagrees with the purpose of that law. By virtue of his executive power, the President may execute the law and control the law execution of others. Under the Take Care Clause, however, the President must exercise his law-execution power to "take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed." - Wikipedia
...And...
Sources: http://bitly.com/Y4Ec4s and http://bitly.com/Y3P4Q1
AC-130 Gunship Was On-Scene In Benghazi With Former SEAL CIA Officer On Ground Pointing Laser Designator At Target, Obama Admin Refused To Let It Fire...
The following was buried in an earlier post but needs to be pointed out. An armed drone was also circling overhead:
[I]n fact, at least one member of the team was on the roof of the annex manning a heavy machine gun when mortars were fired at the CIA compound. The security officer had a laser on the target that was firing and repeatedly requested back-up support from a Specter [AC-130] gunship, which is commonly used by U.S. Special Operations forces to provide support to Special Operations teams on the ground involved in intense firefights. The fighting at the CIA annex went on for more than four hours — enough time for any planes based in Sigonella Air base, just 480 miles away, to arrive. ...two separate Tier One Special operations forces were told to wait...
HT: WZ & PJM
...Lastly...
Obama's BenghaziGate: October Surprise Gone Bad
To contact us Click HERE
The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

The following is a review of pertinent revelations trickling out on BenghaziGate:
10/26 CIA operatives were told to “stand down” in Benghazi after three requests for back-up denied.
10/26 Senators demand that Obama declassify the drone video of the attack.
10/31 Revealed that two major media outlets sitting on information regarding Benghazi.
11/1 Senior U.S. officials say State Department never requested additional security in Benghazi.
11/1 Obama had the hubris to declare “al-Qaeda is decimated” during a campaign stop in Wisconsin following the Benghazi terror attack waged by al-Qaeda militants.
11/1 CBS reports on the Benghazi scandal with a report revealing that standard counterterrorism task force was not convened during the attack.
11/1 Revealed Ambassador Stevens pleaded on phone for help during Benghazi siege.
Important related articles to review:
- Why Was Security Stripped in Benghazi?
- Sources: Key task force not convened during Benghazi consulate attack
- Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA/Jarrett timeline
- SENATOR TOLD NETWORKS HAVE EMAILS FROM WHITE HOUSE ORDERING TEAM TO STAND DOWN ON BENGHAZI RESCUE
- TO MEDIA OUTLETS SITTING ON DAMNING BENGHAZI EMAILS: RELEASE THEM OR BE EXPOSED

24 Kasım 2012 Cumartesi
Obama's Failed Foreign Policy: Al-Qaeda Resurgent
To contact us Click HERE
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
Developing...
White House denies US, Iran to hold one-on-one talks
DEBKAfile October 21, 2012, 4:10 AM (GMT+02:00)
National Security Council spokesman Tommy Vietor Sunday denied the New York Times report that the US and Iran had agreed to hold one-on-one talks on Tehran’s nuclear program before the US election. DEBKAfile: The NYT would not have run with this story without authoritative White House confirmation. The quick denial was necessary because Obama was shown not only to have misled Israel but also his five fellow world powers which together had been holding talks with Iran...
You Forgot, Mr. President, "We Don't Leave Americans Behind"
To contact us Click HERE
The following videos all broke on Oct. 26th. They indicate that the White House observed the Benghazi assault visually and in real time over almost 6 1/2 hours and early on in the assault from the highest levels (POTUS) turned down repeated requests for assistance from both the Ambassador and intelligence officers on the ground in Benghazi. Events completely contrary to what the American people had been told prior to Oct. 26th. Our assessment of the situation follows below these videos:
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
There was an black operation going on here that REQUIRED no security for the Ambassador as had been set up before Sept. 11, 2012, by the Obama Administration so that the Ambassador would have no real dedicted protection, and continued on Sept. 11, with White House "stand down" orders to all security and military personnel in the area while the Ambassador would be abducted. The operation fell apart, though, when 2 former Navy SEALs disobeyed their orders and faught back to try to help the Ambassador, thus disrupting the abduction and escalating the incident into a botched black op. The Office of the POTUS didn't expect there would be 2 former Navy SEAL CIA Officers there who would take the latitude to disobey ill-conceived orders and try to assist those in perceived need. Call it a botched "October Surprise."
TESTED: Osama for Obama's Foreign Contributions
To contact us Click HERE
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Source: http://www.wnd.com/2012/10/obama-accepts-osama-bin-laden-donations/
OBAMA ACCEPTS 'OSAMA BIN LADEN' DONATIONS
No block to foreign money – not even from dead terrorists
by AARON KLEIN Oct. 29, 2012
WASHINGTON – Using a Pakistani Internet Protocol, or IP address, a disposable credit card and a fake address, “Osama bin Laden” has successfully donated twice to Barack Obama’s presidential re-election campaign.
The “Bin Laden” donations, actually made by WND staff, included a listed occupation of “deceased terror chief” and a stated employer of “al-Qaida.”
“Bin Laden” is currently set up on the official campaign website to contribute more to Obama’s campaign. The name is also registered as a volunteer.
Since the “foreign” contribution was sent, “Bin Laden’s” email address has received several solicitations from Obama’s campaign asking for more donations.
The apparently foreign-based contributions were conducted as a test after a flurry of media reports described the ability of foreigners to donate to the Obama campaign but not to Mitt Romney’s site, which has placed safeguards against such efforts.
The acceptance of foreign contributions is strictly illegal under U.S. campaign finance law...
[WND full report HERE.]
[cont.] ... Last week, the New York Post reported a British citizen, Chris Walker, was able to make two $5 donations through Obama’s campaign website, while a similar attempt to give Mitt Romney online funds was rejected.
The Post noted how the Federal Election Commission posted data showing Obama’s campaign took in more than $2 million from donors who provided no ZIP code or incomplete ZIP codes.
Michael Czin, an Obama campaign spokesman, told the Post that FEC data was the result of “a minor technical error.” [The Obama campaign refuses to release the identification of donors who give less than $200.]
... The non-profit Government Accountability Institute recently released a report alleging Obama’s campaign had solicited foreigners for political donations through its social media websites.
As the Daily Caller reported, a statement accompanied the GAI’s report from former U.S. Attorney Ken Sukhia noting that 68 percent of traffic to Obama.com comes from foreign users, all of whom were redirected to a fundraising page operated by the president’s re-election campaign.
The GAI report further documented how Obama.com was registered in September 2008 to Robert Roche, an Obama campaign bundler living in Shanghai, China...
See the GAI report at:
- America the Vulnerable: Are Foreign and Fraudulent Online Campaign Contributions Influencing U.S. Elections? Sept. 26, 2012 (109 pages)
Kaydol:
Kayıtlar (Atom)